Tatiana Schlote-Bonne Week 2

 I enjoy the drafting process most, usually because I'm excited by my ideas/notes and want to put everything into scene and get the characters on the page. This enjoyment is probably because all my writing is creative, fun stuff I actually want to be writing. It's been a long time, like years, since I've written an academic paper and I think my method then was to just plow through it and get it over with ASAP. 

I really like the app Scapple--it's like a virtual post-it board, and I make idea and plot maps on it when I'm working on a story. 

As for unhealthy writing strategies, when I get stuck, I tend to just revise what I already have, and continue to polish my favorite parts instead of plowing through the tough stuff. 

I can't say yet about my writing tutor students since I only met them today and haven't seen their writing assignments, but from grading GEL student papers, a common poor writing strategy I see is to just ramble and repeat oneself until the word count is met, which probably originates from having a poorly formed stance for the paper, or maybe they just didn't read the book that closely.  

Comments

  1. Jose Di PaolaSeptember 8, 2020 at 9:55 PM

    For your example of an unhealthy writing strategy, do you think it's also an example of why organizing the writing process into distinct stages is so important? It sounds like working on sentence-level revisions when the drafting process still isn't completed.

    I am familiar with the issue of word count. I have found it helpful to have content requirements rather than strict word counts, since it prevents students from using filler to bump up the word count.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Andrew post 9

I think it's vitally important for writing center staff to keep abreast of writing center scholarship. Because students who visit writing centers vary widely in their proficiency, their motivations for seeking help, and economic/identity categories, and bring in work from disparate disciplines, staff need to be adaptable to multitudinous tutoring relationships and scenarios. Requiring staff to go through practicum courses (held on maybe a biennial basis) and holding regular department forums where tutors can present research or seek counsel would help keep everyone on the same page with regard to the latest findings and debates in writing center theory and practice. However, I don't think that it's reasonable expect that each member regularly conduct their own research, since many tutors are graduate students or full time instructors whose resources are often already stretched thin on account of pressures to produce writing/research in their own field of study. Asking too m...
Read more

Andrew blog post #10

 I'm usually fairly confident working with writers outside my discipline. I think part of that has to do with my own experience as an undergraduate, where I switched majors from political science to literature to philosophy then, finally, to psychology. To my mind, basic critical thinking skills--the kind that I teach my students in my rhetoric classes--apply just as much to qualitative analyses as they do to quantitative/empirical analyses. Questions of audience and purpose factor into effective writing and communication--approaching any paper, regardless of the class that it's for, I always push writers to ask themselves how much information is necessary for them to provide to contextualize an argument, and remind them that each item of evidence they introduce has to be accompanied by an explanation of its relevance to their overarching thesis. One of my writing center students' first assignment for his rhetoric class was to write a paper about his major (bio-medical engi...
Read more

Andrew blog post 4

Perhaps one way to promote appreciation of other "Englishes," as the CCCC statement (as much as they would disapprove of the use of the term) is to recalibrate considerations of style in writing pedagogy, one that demonstrates that what we call "standard English" is but one among many modes of expression that can be modulated according to varying purposes/audiences. Many people, I think, don't particularly enjoy reading academic English, which, besides imposing oppressive standards on marginalized people, is often a clumsy, bland, and inefficient means of expression; writing is most effective when it comes off as the work of a singular voice and intellect.  Students' general education in universities should also include critical studies of how languages are products of conquest. This, of course, has been a constant throughout history--consider how Spanish and Portuguese integrated Arabic vocabulary by virtue of Muslim rule over the Iberian Peninsula. However...
Read more