Posts

Showing posts from December, 2020

Andrew post 9

I think it's vitally important for writing center staff to keep abreast of writing center scholarship. Because students who visit writing centers vary widely in their proficiency, their motivations for seeking help, and economic/identity categories, and bring in work from disparate disciplines, staff need to be adaptable to multitudinous tutoring relationships and scenarios. Requiring staff to go through practicum courses (held on maybe a biennial basis) and holding regular department forums where tutors can present research or seek counsel would help keep everyone on the same page with regard to the latest findings and debates in writing center theory and practice. However, I don't think that it's reasonable expect that each member regularly conduct their own research, since many tutors are graduate students or full time instructors whose resources are often already stretched thin on account of pressures to produce writing/research in their own field of study. Asking too m...

Andrew post 6

I think that teaching online has actually allowed me to implement practices that reward deep reading over surface reading. Each week I assign a reading and then ask students to respond to a few prompts related to it in that week's discussion board. Later in the week, they have to respond to two of their peers' posts, which they can't see until they've submitted their own posts (this prevents students from simply repeating the points others have already made in the discussion board). In the rubric I use for grading the posts, I establish that there are no "right" or "wrong" answers to the prompts, and that I reward original arguments supported by evidence, and responses to peers that elaborate on the original poster's argument in a meaningful way. I've found that this practice elicits a deeper engagement with the texts than in face-to-face instruction, where I usually break the class into small groups to discuss readings and often only one per...

Andrew blog post 4

Perhaps one way to promote appreciation of other "Englishes," as the CCCC statement (as much as they would disapprove of the use of the term) is to recalibrate considerations of style in writing pedagogy, one that demonstrates that what we call "standard English" is but one among many modes of expression that can be modulated according to varying purposes/audiences. Many people, I think, don't particularly enjoy reading academic English, which, besides imposing oppressive standards on marginalized people, is often a clumsy, bland, and inefficient means of expression; writing is most effective when it comes off as the work of a singular voice and intellect.  Students' general education in universities should also include critical studies of how languages are products of conquest. This, of course, has been a constant throughout history--consider how Spanish and Portuguese integrated Arabic vocabulary by virtue of Muslim rule over the Iberian Peninsula. However...

Andrew week 2

I think my writing process is somewhat unusual, in that the vast majority of it takes place off the page. A professor of mine once told me only 10% of the writing process takes place at the keyboard; the rest involves going about living your life, keeping in mind that all experience provide potential material for writing, even if that potential isn't revealed for months or years. What I've found to be an effective means of putting that into practice is, as soon as I think I have the "storm cloud" of an essay in my mind, starting up a conversation with someone about it. A conversation provides a space where you're immediately putting the idea before an audience before any writing has actually taken place, where the writer can rehearse presenting with clarity in mind and where someone else can ask questions and sometimes even contribute to the elaboration of the core idea, providing associative "rabbit holes" to go down. I really struggle with setting my s...

Andrew week 1

 Question 1) What are some strategies to quickly establish the boundaries of the tutoring situation, i.e., making it clear to students that the writing center is not a "fix-it" shop? Question 2) If a student comes in for a regular appointment without an assignment they are actively working on, what is the best use of that session? Are there exercises pre-prepared by the writing center regarding grammar, paragraph structure, constructing thesis/topic sentences that tutors can have students work through?