Dylan Nice: Number 9
I’m of two minds on the importance of writing centers conducting original research. For smaller writing centers with fewer resources, I would argue conducting research feels optional. However, the faculty and tutors operating that smaller writing center would be wise to keep abreast of the research on writing centers and tutoring being published. On the other hand, someone needs to be providing the latest research for the benefit of all writing centers, and I think that role falls to writing centers housed at R1 universities.
My graduate program (I won’t name which one *wink*) didn’t strongly emphasize pedagogy, and so while I was attending that program--and for a long time afterward--I had the attitude that pedagogy was some sort of highfalutin buzzword with no real significance outside of sounding very learned and serious. But, since starting work in the Rhetoric department (first as an adjunct), I’ve become more acculturated into the importance of reading pedagogical scholarship and considering it against your own practices. I don’t see why teaching in the writing center would be exempt from research-based considerations.
I’m interested in learning more about the teaching of multimodal and digital materials, both in the classroom and in the writing center. Since more and more information is coming at us via formats which are not traditional texts, I think it is worthwhile to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of multimodal media in academic contexts. For instance, if students are assigned a multimodal assignment, does the format come at the expense of something important, like the depth of their understanding on the topic? Perhaps it is a trade-off and the loss of depth makes for gains in the student’s breadth of understanding? While measuring such gains or losses might be tricky, I think useful data might be derived from a study involving a large sample of students completing projects on identical topics but in different formats then responding to detailed and probing questionnaires.
Lastly, I’ve finally learned from the Bedford reading the difference between Quantitative and Qualitative research, terms that up until now I used interchangeably without correction.
I think the point you make about the size of writing centers is a good one. I cam from a writing center that had about 8 tutors at its largest, so trying to conduct research would have been nearly impossible. I think that research is probably also of more interest to graduate tutors than undergraduates in many cases. We did use Bedford guide, publications from other writing centers, and journal articles for training so having research available was valuable.
ReplyDeleteYour question, Dylan, is one of the reasons older faculty are skeptical about multimodal assignments--they suspect that because they appeal to more of the senses, are easier to comprehend, and sometimes feature technological bells and whistles that they may lack depth or at least the opportunity and challenge of putting together whole sentences and discourses (e.g. a ppt vs. an essay).
ReplyDelete